Saturday, March 6, 2010

Military Phonetics Tango

mechanized fantasy


least ten times today I had to listen to this horrendous singing Fabric Easter duck, each of at least ten customers with their ridiculous song and dance their mechanical movements but was able to put in delight, but I ate every something more nervous. In the usual routine of work, time to give me the following thoughts:


mechanization of the imagination!
Each on its own dancing, singing or speaking, and as if by magic evening to life children's toys is more than anything seemingly lifeless doomed to death, heartless, spiritless, weak and lacking in humor because his mechanics him the true character of a game stuff casts, because it takes away any fun potential, the potential in the child's imagination every conceivable - To accept or not only conceivable but also a form imaginable-that the child can conjure up in a toy inside. A singing duck will never be the conqueror of the sub-duvet-world, never the winner childish wars and never to the discovery of completely new worlds, but n ever stay the same singing and therefore useless feathers thing to represent it is committed. Each such 'evening to life "toys is very much a silly childish insult! Is it any wonder

there that the third graders of a friend in their essays on "my fantasy planet" is just creating more time on a planet of unlimited dreams Simpsons to bring true life, to build a house and this round, be planted with flowers! A big shame on the commercialization of the imagination!

It was at three in the train, from states fleeing who wanted to sell me just left Rohstofflager as human reprocessing plant for the raw material man, as I long once more ventured to the question, look how good a world would in me cause such conditions. My only not terribly imaginative decision was that the people in this world at this time certainly would not need features, but slept.


Now, thanks to the singing Plumage, I'm at least a reasonable-if not more imaginative ideas further: It would be a world in which at least our children would still be able to create their fantasy planet, brand new and . A world in which children, at least in their imagination can propel a planet where they swing from vine to vine to the green monster to escape under the sand where people sleep in the water feeds on stones and fish nesting in the trees. A world in which at least the child's imagination can still fly.


With a little more poetic words
"[... even with a flash of it particularly beautiful seemed, though he was more dazzled by its brilliance, as he saw what was going on in it, he had the suspect not added the second sentence,] that probably God from his world prefer to speak on Conjunctivus potentialis (hic Dixerit quispiam = Here one could argue ..) because God makes the world and thinks it might as well be different. "


A quote from Musil's The Man Without Qualities which is to encourage at this point, even God himself to play and to consider how it could equally well be different.

Monday, March 1, 2010

How To Program Older Starchoice Remotes

woman compare

Due some articles that have appeared recently in the TA and in the magazine, I would not mind betting the following comparison.

said the general opinion, this woman is lacking in personal freedom:









The behavior of headscarf-wearing women is incomprehensible to us, they dissolve in us a sense of horror from: why women hide themselves under such obvious symbols of oppression? Why does it limit their own freedom, your own personality to conform with cultural norms, to do social to escape condemnation? And it shows why in God's name their oppression, their social dependence so obviously borne by wearing this veil, rather than to emancipate, what she likes and not what is demanded by patriarchal norms woman?

I am in favor of putting the same questions and claims them too:


are because the answers that is the same:

Without feel women are naked, not all female, not quite themselves only with , she was an independent personality, a good person. Applicable to headscarves, as well on make-up.

course, it is in both pictures to extreme cases, but for the Muslim women, we limit our criticism so long not only to the so-called extreme cases, we should logically us of the extreme examples of society's beauty obsession deal with all casual-headscarved women Léger-eating women set as in the pillory.

as self-realization and self-expression, key to success and joy in life is the beauty still always acted, and this with such skill that no wife or husband will realize how much the woman with it under the veil the social unfreedom is pressed. As the head scarf Muslim in women, even the body consciousness of Western women is nowhere explicitly required, and yet both are culturally authentic as a symbol of woman so far ingrained that an unspoken disregarded Set, who is opposed to the hypocritical authenticity and both women are frequently confronted with social ostracism, they should all be very different from the norm. The only significant difference between the women with headscarves and women's place with Botox lips probably that the former threatens physical violence , should they oppose the dress standards, while the latter themselves physical violence does to to be compliant with the standards. should
The idea of the true Western woman is still anchored in an absolute in us and in their exterior bound as it really frightened us. Unfortunately, it does not. Because these ideas are so deeply etched in our sample, we are ready to consider them as and of course they perceive in their existence has become incapacitated. The behavioral patterns have become far course, that women be marked 'this is without meaning. " present on her bosom, not without pride finally have seen through that man just the way it works, and nothing for, let alone against his behavior. The liberated woman today to be above this male behavior. But I believe that it is wrong, if not is bold, the men of their responsibility to acquit and put them in the dependence of their shoots. (Although the man himself often used that excuse too.) The fact that men in the highest degree of responsibility, if women without makeup, without the 90-60-90 figure, with no well-kept fingernails without plucked eyebrows, shaved legs, no, no heel shoes and (admit to only a selection of all the physical pain again) without constricting jeans do not feel as women, can be easy to prove, by us Question to answer, then, are the Muslim whether men or women whose polluters when women without headscarves not feel well have the answer and then pull back the parallel.

The next step is absolutely necessary for the emancipation of women will not work without the perceived responsibility of men. The problem is that it is generally believed (because, ironically, claim that the women themselves always) plastic surgery and pain diets geschähen on absolutely voluntary basis, a blue-eyed belief in the feminine sense and human freedom of choice, but I venture here again to say that women who can inject the lips, act as unfree, as women who wear the headscarf was, but this request (not just the norm!) so strongly inculcated, that woman herself the constant social pressure to perform can not and convinced is to act freely.
A look, a little joke, a nice comment is as individual detached action by no means a disaster, but they are subtle and therefore most dangerous manifestations of false value systems of our culture and thus in principle absolutely outrageous that the woman is not only the effect can understand!